Main Page Content

The percentage of individuals in Windsor-Essex County who report that they have heart disease is presented below. The impact that age and sex, as well as various social variables have on rates is also presented.

Table 1: Percentage of Individuals Reporting Heart Disease by Year, Ages 12 and Older
  2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Percent % 4.1 7.0 E 4.2 E 4.7 E  7.9 E 4.5 E
95% CI 2.5-6.4 4.7-10.4 2.9-6.1 3.4-6.6 4.5-13.6 2.8-7.1

E Interpret with caution due to high sampling variability

There is no significant difference in heart disease rates from 2007 to 2012.

Table 2: Percentage of Individuals Reporting Heart Disease by Age and Sex, 2007-2012
  Male
Percent (95% CI)
Female
Percent (95% CI)
Total
Both Sexes
Age 12 to 19 NR NR NR
Age 20 to 44 NR NR NR
Age 45 to 64 4.3 E (2.7-6.7) NR 5.9 E (3.6-9.4)
Age 65 and over 23.2 (17.8-29.6) 17.1 (12.9-22.4) 19.9 (16.6-23.7)
Total All Ages 5.0 (3.9-6.3) 5.8 (4.3-7.8) 5.4  (4.4-6.6)

E Interpret with caution due to high sampling variability 
NR = not reportable due to high sampling variability

For values that were reportable there are no significant differences found between heart disease rates for males and females. There are significant differences by age, with those aged 65 or over having higher rates than those aged 45 to 64.

Table 3: Percentage of Individuals Reporting Heart Disease by Income Quintile, Ages 12 and Older, 2007-2012
  Quintile 1
Lowest Income
Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5
Highest Income
Percent 6.8 E 7.4 E 5.1 E 4.0 E 3.7 E
95% CI 4.2-11.0 5.5-9.8 3.6-7.1 2.3-6.9 2.0-6.5

E Interpret with caution due to high sampling variability 
NR = not reportable due to high sampling variability

There is no difference in the percentage of individuals who have heart disease based on income.

Table 4: Percentage of Individuals Reporting Heart Disease by Education Level, Ages 12 and Older, 2007-2012
  Less Than
Secondary School
Secondary School
Graduate
Some
Post-Secondary
Post-Secondary
Graduate
Percent (%) 7.7 4.7 E NR 4.9 E
95% CI 5.7-10.3 3.3-6.8 NR 3.4-7.2

E Interpret with caution due to high variability 
NR = Not reportable due to high sampling variability

There is no difference in heart disease rates based on level of education.

Table 5: Percentage of Individuals Reporting Heart Disease by Minority Status, Ages 12 and Older, 2007-2012
  White Minority
Percent (%) 5.4 NR
95% CI 4.4-6.5 NR

NR = Not reportable due to high sampling variability

Possible differences in the percentage of individuals with heart disease based on minority status cannot be determined.

Table 6: Percentage of Individuals Reporting Heart Disease by Immigration Status, Ages 12 and Older, 2007-2012
  Born in Canada Immigrant
Percent (%) 4.9  7.2 E
95% CI 4.0-6.0 4.7-11.1

E Interpret with caution due to high variability 

There is no difference in the percentage of people who report having heart disease based on whether an individual was born in Canada or not. 

Data Notes

  1. Data Source: Canadian Community Health Survey, [2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012], Share File, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.
  2. The Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) collects data through participant self-report. Data collected through self-report can be biased due to inaccurate memory or because of social desirability. Social desirability happens when individuals answer questions in a manner that they think will be viewed favourably, and is more likely to occur when individuals are answering sensitive questions.
  3. Values are for those aged 12 and over.
  4. Not Stated and Don’t Know responses were excluded from analysis.
  5. 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. The 95% confidence interval provides a range within which we are 95% confident that the true population proportion (%) falls. If a stated result percentage is 18% with a 95% CI of 15.0-21.0%, we can be 95% confident that the true percentage lies within the range of 15.0% to 21.0%. The wider the confidence interval, the more variability there is, and the less precise the estimate.
  6. Significant differences were determined based on non-overlapping confidence intervals.
  7. Understanding income quintiles used in this report: The Canadian Community Health Survey contains a variable that groups Windsor-Essex survey respondents into one of 10 income deciles. Each decile contains 10% of the sample population. So that the lowest or first decile contains the 10% of the population that has the lowest household income, and the highest or 10th decile contains the 10% of the sample population that has the highest household income. The calculation takes into account reported household income, low-income cut-off values, household size, and community size. For the purposes of this report, deciles were used to create quintiles for ease of analysis and interpretation (quintiles are fifths, and so each quintile contains 20% of the sample population). The lowest two deciles were combined to make the lowest quintile, the third and fourth deciles were combined to create the second lowest quintile, and so forth, with the two highest income deciles being combined to make the highest income quintile.
  8. A white ethnic background was defined as an individual who reported that their ethnicity was white. All other ethnicities were coded as minority.
  9. Immigrant was defined as someone who had ever immigrated to Canada.
  10. The geographical area of Windsor-Essex County represents the population of the entire county of Essex and includes all municipalities within the county.
  11. Age standardized statistics available upon request.